Earth's
final frontier
Nations
claim the ocean floor
By
David Stonehouse A
high-stakes battle is under way for swaths of the Earth's
last
unclaimed territory: the sea bottom. Countries
around the world are racing to lay claims to continental
shelves under a set of little-known United Nations regulations
-- claims
that are mind-boggling in their complexity, but equally astounding
for
their potential payoffs.
Experts
estimate the undersea terrain, rich as it is in oil, gas
and
other treasures, is worth trillions of dollars.
"This is the last territory we have on Earth to divide
up," says David
Monahan, the man in charge of preparing Canada's claim, "and
some of it
is going to get hot."
It
will also be hotly disputed, and the haggling will drag
on for years
-- most of it in secret.
Claims
to the sea bottom are based on a provision under the 1982
UN
Convention on the Law of the Sea allowing countries to extend
their
territory beyond the traditional 200 nautical-mile offshore
limit if
they can prove the "submerged prolongation" of
their land stretches
beyond that. The technical rules for continental-shelf claims
were
completed in 1999.
But
the world's coastal nations did not seem to pay much notice
to the
provision until Russia submitted the first claim a little
more than a
year ago. The federation's claim was by no means modest:
It sought
control over almost half the ocean floor.
Suddenly, nations woke up to the potential windfall off
their shores.
The
United States scrambled to get expert opinions on what
kind of case
it might have and how much it would cost -- even though it
has not yet
ratified the convention.
Neither
has Canada, but government scientists and others have already
plunged into an effort to make extended claims under the
Arctic and
Atlantic oceans. In all, about 60 countries could submit
claims,
accounting for a total of roughly 15 million square kilometres,
or about
five per cent of the ocean floor.
"Countries
are going to balloon out and grab up as much ocean floor
as
they can," says Ron Macnab, a marine geophysicist who
has retired from
the Geological Service of Canada and now serves as a consultant
to
countries seeking more underwater territory. "It is
one of the few ways
nowadays where you can expand your territory without going
to war."
Of
course, this is more than a land grab. Some countries will
come away
with untapped, lucrative resources underneath the silt. One
estimate
tagged the potential wealth of an American claim at $1.3
trillion US.
The
claims are not easy to make, however. The provision under
Article 76
of the convention calls for a comprehensive compilation of
data,
including detailed analyses of the contours of the sea floor
and the
sediment beneath it.
Gathering
the necessary underwater measurements -- including hydrographic,
geophysical and geologic data -- is a painstakingly
slow
process, often involving hydrophonic gear on boats going
only slightly
faster than you can walk.
"Imagine
now if you are trying to map an area the size of the Prairie
provinces on foot," says Monahan, a professor at the
University of New
Brunswick and director of ocean mapping for the federal Department
of
Fisheries and Oceans.
Canada
is considering a claim of about 750,000 square kilometres
off the
East Coast and another 500,000 square kilometres in the Arctic.
Taken
together, the two claims amount to roughly the size of the
three Prairie
provinces combined. (There is no claim to extra territory
off the West
Coast: The coastal drop-off is too dramatic for the sea bottom
to be
considered an extension of the continental shelf).
This
is not a cheap exercise. Estimates put the cost of filing
a
Canadian claim at $60 million, although Monahan is quick
to point out
that the data gathered would also be useful for other purposes.
American
scientists are likewise studying the possibilities; potential
claim areas include the Gulf of Mexico and continental- shelf
areas off
the U.S. east coast and Alaska.
There
is little doubt that the effort could pay off: Tapping
into the
oil and gas reserves on the shelf will be very lucrative.
And, trapped
under continental shelves around the globe, there are also
vast reserves
of a frozen gas called methane hydrate, a potentially plentiful
fuel
source if scientists can find a way to free it.
There
are also other the potential prizes lying in wait: The
creatures
lying or crawling along the ocean floor.
"We
don't know a hell of a lot about species that live on the
sea bed
besides food stocks. But we do know that in some parts of
the ocean
there are life forms that could provide materials for some
pharmaceuticals," Macnab says. Scientists at the University
of British
Columbia, for example, are experimenting with ocean sponges
containing
chemicals that may be effective in treating cancer and Alzheimer's
disease.
Approved
claims to territory beyond the 200 nautical-mile limit
will
expand nations' sovereignty over the ocean floor, what lies
beneath it
and sedentary species that live along the bottom. Waters
over the new
territory and the creatures that live above the sea floor
will remain
the "common heritage of mankind," as the UN puts
it.
The
carving up of the continental shelves worries environmentalist
Elizabeth May. She views it as greater "privatization" of
the oceans and
further exploitation of their resources.
Countries
have 10 years after ratification of the UN convention to
file
claims to the continental shelf; the first nations to ratify
the pact
face a deadline of 2009.
(Also
appeared in the Ottawa Citizen and St. John's Telegram)
© 2004
David Stonehouse. For permissions to reprint, please e-mail info@davidstonehouse.com
|